HRMS Team: Skills and Knowledge
If you look at the various stages of your HRMS project and the likely hurdles it will have to leap, you can develop a picture of your ideal HRMS team; a picture of the stakeholder groups you want to be represented and other key people to have input. But when it comes to deciding which individuals would best contribute to your HRMS team, you have to select on their personal skills and knowledge as well as just who they may have access to.
Specialist and Technical
There will be certain areas of specialist knowledge that your team will need to deploy at different stages of the project. HR is an obvious one. While a new HRMS is an ideal opportunity to review and rewrite the organization’s people processes, in order to do so you need the expertise of an HR professional who understands the strategic imperative behind such processes and also their practical implications.
Similarly, whether you end up with an on-site solution or place everything in the cloud, there will be technical implications for your new system – servers, encryption, data transfer, etc. – and the need for someone on the team who can advise knowledgeably on such issues is paramount.
Depending on the size and sector of your organization (or the size of the investment you are about to make) you may have to comply with certain procurement requirements and procedures as part of purchasing the new system. Again, access to expert and experienced knowledge will help the HRMS team get it right first time.
Finally, at least someone on the team will need to offer up a detailed understanding of HRMS systems and their capabilities.
Practical and Generic
Don’t let the word “generic” fool you…, these less technical skills are no less essential to HRMS success. Effective decision-making is an art in itself – identifying and understanding broad and conflicting criteria and then balancing them to make the right choice for the right reasons at the right time – and your project team will be making dozens of decisions, each of which will affect the organization in some way. A combination of decision-making approaches is required: big picture, intricate detail, logic and impact on people’s feelings and motivations all must be included in the mix.
The right people with the wrong skills or an absence of skills and knowledge within the HRMS team is a sure path to HRMS failure.
Likewise, while those employees at the ‘bottom’ of the hierarchy can often feel left out and dismissed, their input is actually crucial at various stages of the project; only they can know exactly how the system will impact their day-to-day work (and by extension, the day-to-day business of the organization).
Either through lack of opportunity to gain the relevant experience or the existence of other business priorities, sometimes you simply cannot find or access the skills and knowledge you need from within the organization. In these circumstances, you may choose to supplement your HRMS team with external talent: an HRMS consultant. If you do, then as a minimum, that consultant should have: a broad understanding of the HRMS niche, sufficient prior experience of such projects, credibility with key stakeholders and, of course, the particular skills and knowledge that your in-house team is lacking.
The right people with the wrong skills or an absence of skills and knowledge within the HRMS team is a sure path to HRMS failure. In fact, in summary, it might even be fair to say that the skills you can deploy are more critical than the groups that individual team members may represent, after all, skills get the job done. Although, naturally, the ideal team will be a combination of both.
What I wish I knew before my first HRMS implementation
Experienced HR manager Dave Foxall discusses lessons learned during his first HRMS implementation...
Three issues you’ll face when implementing an HRMS time and attendance module
The difficulties you will face when implementing an HRMS time and attendance module and how to ov...
How much HRMS testing is too much testing?
How to tell whether your HRMS testing activities adequate or overly cautious